There is a lot of guidance to clarify the human rights-based approach to planning. We're here to consolidate and translate these resources for your, to assist you in the process of building systems to generate more equitable outcomes.
CP Planning operates on the foundational belief that urban planning’s responsibility extends beyond the physical space; it is critical tool for ensuring that human rights are met. Systemic disparities in access to housing, good jobs, and cultural opportunities are perpetuated when racialized communities, women, low-income households, and other equity denied populations are excluded from meaningful participation in planning processes. Such barriers limit their ability to benefit equitably from the management and development of land.
Recognizing these barriers, CP Planning has conducted thorough research on the intersection of human rights and urban planning, establishing a human rights-based approach which dismantles entrenched barriers and produces the conditions for systems transformations that improve the living conditions of equity-denied groups. Fundamental resources in this research included those produced by the United Nations, the Canadian National Housing Strategy, and the Ontario Human Rights Commission, as well as case studies and case law across Canada and the United States.
A Human Rights-Based Approach to Planning is:
In 2018 CP Planning co-designed and implemented the Housing in Focus project. It was delivered through partnerships with 11 community groups and engaged 140 residents in East York, Etobicoke Lakeshore, York, Scarborough, and Downtown Toronto through workshops hosted in church basements and community centres.
The workshops centred around the lived experience of residents and concluded with resident's generating over 18 maps in response to the prompt "what would your neighbourhood look like, if housing was treated as a human right?"
The above is illustrates the combination of all the Housing in Focus maps produced in Danforth-Main, Toronto.
Wanna learn more about the project?
Historically, planning practices have, at times, contributed to discrimination, leading to interventions by human rights champions and legal bodies.
The below are notable pivotal cases that add clarity to how planning can conflict with human rights. These cases were predominantly driven by leaders who are not 'professional planners' accredited by the Ontario Professional Planners Institute. Their actions, nonetheless have been instrumental in integrating human rights considerations into provincial planning legislation. As urban planners, it's crucial to acknowledge and value the efforts made by community members with a deep commitment to the well being of marginalized peoples.
Beginning in 1946, the township of North York explicitly zoned for “families.” This bylaw defined “family” as a household whose residents were related to one another.
In 1971, the Globe and Mail reported on a high-profile case that ultimately challenged this bylaw. That year, after five weeks of searching, four women rented a $300-per-month basement apartment in a house on Walwyn Avenue, just north of Weston. Their tenure violated the zoning bylaw, which only permitted families to live in the area.
Within a month, a North York bylaw inspector warned the women that they had to move out or face a court case. The women immediately began to lobby North York to change the bylaw. One of the tenants, a teacher named Barbara Greene, was elected as North York’s first female councillor on the heels of her popular fight against the bylaw. In office, she pushed to have the Ontario Municipal Board review the bylaw. In 1974, Greene celebrated after the discriminatory bylaw was overturned.
After being a councillor in North York from 1972-1985, Barbara served at the House of Commons of Canada from 1988 to 1993 as a member of the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada.
The story of Barbara Greene, her three women roommates, and the ways land use zoning bylaws discriminate against single women is described in further detail in one of the chapters in House Divided written by our Executive Direcor (Cheryll!). The chapter was also published in Walrus magazine. Read 'How Neighbourhoods Are Built to Keep Out Single Women', here.
Advocacy Centre For Tenants Ontario, Paul Dowling, House of Friendship and Waterloo Region Community Legal Services won an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) under subsections of the Planning Act from a decision of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to approve Official Plan Amendments and the City of Kitchener's Zoning By-law Amendment that discriminated against those with disabilities. The amendments of the Region of Waterloo and City of Kitchener sought to ban the development of housing for those needing in-home care.
As a result of community appeal against the decision of planners, the OMB:
The Dream Team, a coalition of mental health consumers funded mainly by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, and the Toronto-Central Local Health Integration Network, retained the legal assistance of the Human Rights Legal Support Centre to file human rights applications at the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal (OHRT) of Ontario against four Ontario municipalities: Sarnia, Kitchener, Smiths Falls, and Toronto. These applications challenged discriminatory bylaws that imposed mandatory distances between group homes, dictating how close one group home can be to other group homes or other supportive housing.
Results include:
The three types of human rights discrimination are described by lawyer Jessica Simone Roher, in her article 'Zoning Out Discrimination: Working Towards Housing Equality in Ontario', published by the Journal of Law and Social Policy in 2016.
Click here to see the reading list page 'Planning and Human Rights: Legal Cases and Resources' prepared by the Ontario Human Rights Commission
This page is a vital resource for planners and community members alike, guiding the integration of human rights laws and principles into urban planning. It underscores the importance of compliance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, National Housing Strategy Act, and Ontario Human Rights Code. Our focus is to remove barriers to knowledge on the intersection of urban planning and human rights history, obligations, and best practices.
We encourage everyone, not just professional planners, to explore these resources.
'We', 'us', and 'our' throughout this page refers to those in the planning community, from urban planners to planning educators, to grassroots leaders who influence land use and real estate policies.
The Planning Act is provincial legislation that sets out the ground rules for land use planning in Ontario. It describes how land uses may be controlled, and who may control them. It provides the basis for preparing Official Plans and planning polices that will guide future development, tools to facilitate planning for the future, regulating and controlling land uses through zoning bylaws and minor variances, and ensuring the right of local citizens to be notified about planning decisions, to give their views tot heir municipal council, and where permitted, to appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT).
Key statements of the Planning Act (emphasis added):
The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) is governed by the Planning Act. The Planning Act states that planning decisions of the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board, a minister of the Crown and a ministry, board, commission or agency of the government, (a) shall be consistent with the policy statements; and (b) shall conform with the provincial plans that are in effect on that date, or shall not conflict with them, as the case may be.
A direct result of the work of the Dream Team and the Ontario Human Rights Commission, statement 4.6 was added to the 2014 PPS, the first update since 2005. The 2020 PPS includes this as statement 4.4.
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.
Thank you for learning more about our work
Our work is possible due to the generous donations and contributions from government, and community leaders.
Interested in investing the transition to a more inclusive planning economy?